Coordination Review for Architects

Why Architects Need Coordination Review

Architects are accountable for overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants. One thing that keeps coming up for this role is getting blamed for coordination conflicts that actually started in a consultant's drawings but show up on the architectural set.

Coordination Review is meant to fix that. It gets applied when drawings from multiple disciplines need to be checked against each other, with a specific goal: surface conflicts between architectural, structural, and MEP drawings before they reach the field.

What Structured AI Checks for Architects

For architects running coordination review, Structured AI uses Overlay, which auto-aligns sheets from different disciplines, even at different scales, so cross-discipline conflicts show up without manual light table work. Findings are scoped to what this role is actually on the hook for, not a generic error list, but issues organized around overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants.

On a Stage 4 submission with a 500-page set, fire strategy, waterproofing, and accessibility all need to be checked against the fire report, sheet by sheet. Structured checks the same package in about 20 minutes and returns every compliance check with the exact page and a recommended fix.

Where This Fits in Your Workflow

Coordination Review for architects usually happens when drawings from multiple disciplines need to be checked against each other. Structured AI works on .pdf, .dwg, .rvt, and .ifc files, and for Revit modeled projects, the Revit Add-In runs the same checks directly against live geometry with element level results, no export needed. Findings can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline, so the review step slots into the existing document workflow instead of adding a new one.

FAQ

How is coordination review different from a general plan check? Coordination Review is scoped to what actually matters at this stage of the project and for this role: surface conflicts between architectural, structural, and MEP drawings before they reach the field. It uses Structured AI's deterministic checks rather than a confidence-scored, probabilistic flag.

Do architects need special training to use this? No. Upload the relevant drawings and specifications, or connect the Revit model directly, and findings come back organized the way architects already review work. Teams can also build Custom Checks in plain English without writing any code.

Can findings be shared with the rest of the project team? Yes. Every finding links back to the exact sheet and location, and can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline for team wide visibility and follow up.