Solutions
QA/QC Review for Architects
Why Architects Need QA/QC Review
Architects are accountable for overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants. One thing that keeps coming up for this role is getting blamed for coordination conflicts that actually started in a consultant's drawings but show up on the architectural set.
That's exactly where QA/QC Review comes in. It runs as a standardized quality control step applied consistently across projects, and the point of it is to give a firm a repeatable, documented QA/QC process instead of relying on whichever reviewer has time that week.
What Structured AI Checks for Architects
For architects running qa/qc review, Structured AI uses the full QA/QC Compliance Checks library, which grows check by check as the firm defines what matters, so every project gets the same standardized review. Findings are scoped to what this role is actually on the hook for, not a generic error list, but issues organized around overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants.
On a Stage 4 submission with a 500-page set, fire strategy, waterproofing, and accessibility all need to be checked against the fire report, sheet by sheet. Structured checks the same package in about 20 minutes and returns every compliance check with the exact page and a recommended fix.
Where This Fits in Your Workflow
QA/QC Review for architects usually happens as a standardized quality control step applied consistently across projects. Structured AI works on .pdf, .dwg, .rvt, and .ifc files, and for Revit modeled projects, the Revit Add-In runs the same checks directly against live geometry with element level results, no export needed. Findings can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline, so the review step slots into the existing document workflow instead of adding a new one.
FAQ
How is qa/qc review different from a general plan check? QA/QC Review is scoped to what actually matters at this stage of the project and for this role: give a firm a repeatable, documented QA/QC process instead of relying on whichever reviewer has time that week. It uses Structured AI's deterministic checks rather than a confidence-scored, probabilistic flag.
Do architects need special training to use this? No. Upload the relevant drawings and specifications, or connect the Revit model directly, and findings come back organized the way architects already review work. Teams can also build Custom Checks in plain English without writing any code.
Can findings be shared with the rest of the project team? Yes. Every finding links back to the exact sheet and location, and can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline for team wide visibility and follow up.
This review for other roles
See It on Your Own Drawings
Book a demo and watch Structured review a real drawing set: every finding with the exact page, location, issue, and fix.
Book a Demo