Pre-Permit Review for Architects

Why Architects Need Pre-Permit Review

Architects are accountable for overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants. One thing that keeps coming up for this role is getting blamed for coordination conflicts that actually started in a consultant's drawings but show up on the architectural set.

Pre-Permit Review addresses this head on, applied before a drawing set goes to the jurisdiction for permit. The goal is straightforward: catch code and coordination issues that would otherwise turn into plan check comments and correction cycles.

What Structured AI Checks for Architects

For architects running pre-permit review, Structured AI uses QA/QC Compliance Checks, run against the full code and compliance library before submittal. Every finding comes back with the exact page, location, issue, and fix. Findings are scoped to what this role is actually on the hook for, not a generic error list, but issues organized around overall design intent, code compliance across the building envelope, and coordinating between all consultants.

On a Stage 4 submission with a 500-page set, fire strategy, waterproofing, and accessibility all need to be checked against the fire report, sheet by sheet. Structured checks the same package in about 20 minutes and returns every compliance check with the exact page and a recommended fix.

Where This Fits in Your Workflow

Pre-Permit Review for architects usually happens before a drawing set goes to the jurisdiction for permit. Structured AI works on .pdf, .dwg, .rvt, and .ifc files, and for Revit modeled projects, the Revit Add-In runs the same checks directly against live geometry with element level results, no export needed. Findings can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline, so the review step slots into the existing document workflow instead of adding a new one.

FAQ

How is pre-permit review different from a general plan check? Pre-Permit Review is scoped to what actually matters at this stage of the project and for this role: catch code and coordination issues that would otherwise turn into plan check comments and correction cycles. It uses Structured AI's deterministic checks rather than a confidence-scored, probabilistic flag.

Do architects need special training to use this? No. Upload the relevant drawings and specifications, or connect the Revit model directly, and findings come back organized the way architects already review work. Teams can also build Custom Checks in plain English without writing any code.

Can findings be shared with the rest of the project team? Yes. Every finding links back to the exact sheet and location, and can be exported and assigned by trade or discipline for team wide visibility and follow up.